Tacedinaline

 CAS No.: 112522-64-2  Cat No.: BP-300094  Purity: >98% 4.5  

Tacedinaline is a benzamide-type HDAC ligand that engages class I histone deacetylase catalytic sites and provides a recognition scaffold for epigenetic enzyme degradation research. Its HDAC-binding pharmacophore can be considered for PROTAC design if a linker-compatible derivatization site preserves target engagement. In a bifunctional degrader, the tacedinaline-derived moiety would bind an HDAC target, while a linker connects it to an E3 ligase recruiter to promote induced proximity with ubiquitination machinery. The intended function is HDAC ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated depletion, enabling comparison of deacetylase inhibition with protein-level removal. Tacedinaline is useful for HDAC degrader exploration, chromatin regulation studies, class-selective HDAC biology, linker attachment analysis, and target engagement assay development.

Tacedinaline

Structure of 112522-64-2

Quality
Assurance

Worldwide
Delivery

24/7 Customer
Support
Category
Ligand for Target Protein
Molecular Formula
C15H15N3O2
Molecular Weight
269.304

* For research and manufacturing use only. Not for human or clinical use.

SizePriceStockQuantity
-- $-- In stock

Looking for different specifications? Click to request a custom quote!

Capabilities & Facilities

  • Comprehensive PROTAC Platform
  • Scientific Expertise & Technical Support
  • Custom Synthesis & Design Service
  • Extensive Product Coverage
  • Cutting-Edge Innovation
  • Fast Delivery & Global Support
  • 24/7 customer service
  • 100% quality assurance
Popular Publications Citing BOC Sciences Products
Purity
>98%
Synonyms
CI 994; CI-994; Acetyldinaline; 4-acetamido-N-(2-aminophenyl)benzamide
InChI Key
VAZAPHZUAVEOMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChI
InChI=1S/C15H15N3O2/c1-10(19)17-12-8-6-11(7-9-12)15(20)18-14-5-3-2-4-13(14)16/h2-9H,16H2,1H3,(H,17,19)(H,18,20)
SMILES
CC(=O)NC1=CC=C(C=C1)C(=O)NC2=CC=CC=C2N
Mechanism

Target: This ligand targets class I histone deacetylases HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 in biochemical or cellular target-engagement studies.

Mechanism of Action: Used as the target-protein recognition element, this ligand provides the binding interface for class I histone deacetylases HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3. In PROTAC design, a derivatizable position on the ligand can be connected through an optimized linker to an E3 ligase ligand, such as a CRBN, VHL, or IAP recruiter, while preserving productive target engagement. The resulting bifunctional molecule brings class I histone deacetylases HDAC1 into proximity with the recruited E3 ligase, enabling ternary-complex formation. If the complex has favorable geometry and residence time, target lysine ubiquitination is promoted, leading to proteasome-dependent degradation in experimental systems.

Applications

• PROTAC-Mediated Degradation: Tacedinaline can be incorporated as a binding ligand within PROTAC constructs to recruit an E3 ligase and drive selective degradation of the intended protein target. This approach enables functional interrogation beyond inhibition by shifting the cellular protein level, supporting studies of pathway dependence and degradation kinetics.

• E3 Ligase Recruitment Optimization: Use tacedinaline-derived PROTAC designs to systematically vary linker length, attachment position, and ligand geometry to enhance ternary complex formation. By tuning these parameters, researchers can improve ubiquitination efficiency and degradation potency, enabling mechanistic comparisons across E3 ligases and clarifying structure–activity relationships.

• Target Engagement and Turnover: PROTACs built with tacedinaline can be used to measure target engagement through time-resolved degradation assays. Monitoring protein loss alongside downstream signaling readouts helps distinguish between transient binding and sustained turnover, providing quantitative insight into degradation half-life and the contribution of proteasome-dependent processing.

• Pathway Mechanism Studies: Employ tacedinaline-based PROTACs to dissect cellular mechanisms by selectively eliminating the target protein and observing compensatory responses. This strategy supports mapping of signaling networks, identification of resistance factors, and evaluation of whether phenotypes arise from loss of protein function versus altered transcriptional programs.

• Proteasome-Dependent Validation: Tacedinaline-containing PROTACs can be validated using proteasome inhibition and ubiquitination readouts to confirm degradation mechanism. Such experiments establish whether the observed reduction in target abundance is driven by ubiquitin–proteasome pathways, strengthening causal links between ternary complex formation and functional protein depletion.

1.Efficacy of acetyldinaline for treatment of minimal residual disease (MRD): preclinical studies in the BNML rat model for human acute myelocytic leukemia.
el-Beltagi HM;Martens AC;Dahab GM;Hagenbeek A Leukemia. 1993 Nov;7(11):1795-800.
The efficacy of acetyldinaline [4-acetylamino-N-(2'-aminophenyl)-benzamide] for eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is left after bone marrow transplantation, and the risk of a bone marrow graft being jeopardized by this treatment was studied in the Brown Norway rat acute myelocytic leukemia model (BNML). To mimic the clinical situation, MRD induction treatment was given to rats showing clinical signs of leukemia and consisted of 80 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and 7.0 Gy X-rays total body irradiation resulting in a 6-8 log leukemic cell kill leaving 10-1000 leukemic cells in the animals. Treatment was completed with a syngeneic bone marrow transplant. A high dose level (HD) treatment of 23.7 mg acetyldinaline/kg per day and a low dose level (LD) treatment of 11.85 mg/kg per day, each given orally for five consecutive days, were compared. The increase in the survival time, the cure rate, and the toxic death rate were evaluated. One 5-day course of LD treatment, started at a time interval of 10, 17, or 24 days following MRD induction, resulted in 44%, 11% or 0% cures. With two 5-day courses of LD treatment, 89%, 22%, or 0% cures were achieved. With LD treatment, maximally an 8 log leukemic cell kill was obtained and no toxicity-related deaths were observed (only less than a 1 log kill of normal hemopoietic stem cells).
2.Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens that increase dose per cycle (dose intensity) by extending daily dosing from 5 consecutive days to 28 consecutive days and beyond.
Keyes KA;Albella B;LoRusso PM;Bueren JA;Parchment RE Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jun;6(6):2474-81.
Dose intensity, defined as dose administered per unit time, has emerged as a potentially important measurement of anticancer drug exposure and determinant of efficacy. There are several strategies for increasing dose intensity, one being a protracted daily dosing strategy without major dose reduction for toxicity. This strategy involves continued therapy during periods of recovery from reversible toxicity, and it inherently challenges our understanding that renewing tissues cannot repopulate (recover) in the continued presence of cytotoxic drug. We have tested this idea directly in a murine preclinical trial. Specifically, we have tested whether acutely myelotoxic doses of gemcitabine (i.p. injection, 6.0 mg/m2/day), acetyldinaline [CI-994; GOE 5549; PD 123 654; 4-acetylamino-N-(2'-aminophenyl)-benzamide, 150 mg/m2/day p.o.], and/or melphalan (i.p. injection, 7.2 mg/m2/day) can be tolerated for 28 consecutive days and whether suppressed bone marrow function recovers despite this protracted daily therapy. The three drugs all caused acute neutropenia and suppression of medullary hematopoiesis. Damage to progenitor populations exposed to acetyldinaline and gemcitabine was not as severe as that caused by melphalan, in which case absolute neutrophil count, mature progenitors (colony-forming unit granulocyte/macrophage), and immature progenitors (colony-forming unit-S) progressively declined to severely depressed levels.
3.Morphine-induced synaptic plasticity in the VTA is reversed by HDAC inhibition.
Authement ME;Langlois LD;Kassis H;Gouty S;Dacher M;Shepard RD;Cox BM;Nugent FS J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1093-103. doi: 10.1152/jn.00238.2016. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Dopamine (DA) dysfunction originating from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) occurs as a result of synaptic abnormalities following consumption of drugs of abuse and underlies behavioral plasticity associated with drug abuse. Drugs of abuse can cause changes in gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms in the brain that underlie some of the lasting neuroplasticity and behavior associated with addiction. Here we investigated the function of histone acetylation and histone deacetylase (HDAC)2 in the VTA in recovery of morphine-induced synaptic modifications following a single in vivo exposure to morphine. Using a combination of immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and whole cell patch-clamp recording in rat midbrain slices, we show that morphine increased HDAC2 activity in VTA DA neurons and reduced histone H3 acetylation at lysine 9 (Ac-H3K9) in the VTA 24 h after the injection. Morphine-induced synaptic changes at glutamatergic synapses involved endocannabinoid signaling to reduce GABAergic synaptic strength onto VTA DA neurons. Both plasticities were recovered by in vitro incubation of midbrain slices with a class I-specific HDAC inhibitor (HDACi), CI-994, through an increase in acetylation of histone H3K9.
ConcentrationVolumeMass1 mg5 mg10 mg
1 mM3.7133 mL18.5667 mL37.1333 mL
5 mM0.7427 mL3.7133 mL7.4267 mL
10 mM0.3713 mL1.8567 mL3.7133 mL
50 mM0.0743 mL0.3713 mL0.7427 mL

Tacedinaline is a HDAC target ligand intended for use as the target-engaging component or reference ligand in PROTAC discovery workflows. Its known small-molecule recognition profile enables rational linker-vector evaluation and comparative degrader design. This molecule is described in detail below.

Structure: The structure of Tacedinaline is characterized by primary or secondary amine/basic nitrogen centers; amide/urea/sulfonamide hydrogen-bonding motifs. These features provide defined hydrogen-bonding, hydrophobic, and steric elements that can support affinity retention while enabling analogue-based linker-vector selection.

Reactivity: The amine/basic nitrogen-containing motif can be evaluated for acylation, sulfonylation, alkylation, or carbamate/urea linker installation when that vector is solvent exposed. For PROTAC construction, the POI ligand can be paired with CRBN ligands such as thalidomide, pomalidomide, or lenalidomide analogues, VHL ligands such as VH032 derivatives, or less common IAP/MDM2/cIAP-recruiting ligands, with alkyl, PEG, piperazine, triazole, or amide linkers screened for ternary-complex formation. In practice, incorporation into PROTACs should begin from derivatives that preserve the reported binding pharmacophore, followed by systematic variation of linker length, polarity, rigidity, and exit-vector geometry to optimize target engagement, E3 recruitment, and cellular degradation readouts.

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Related Product Recommendations

BOC Sciences Support

Please contact us with any specific requirements and we will get back to you as soon as possible.


  • Verification code

We invite you to contact us at or through our contact form above for more information about our services and products.

USA
  • International:
  • US & Canada (Toll free):
  • Email:
  • Fax:
Germany
Inquiry Basket