Androgen receptor antagonist 1

 CAS No.: 1338812-36-4  Cat No.: BP-300058  Purity: 99% 4.5  

Androgen receptor antagonist 1 is an androgen receptor ligand that binds the receptor ligand-binding domain and can be used as a target-recognition element for AR-directed PROTAC synthesis. In a bifunctional degrader, the antagonist-derived moiety engages androgen receptor, while a linker connects it to an E3 ligase recruiter to promote receptor proximity to ubiquitination machinery. Productive ternary complex formation can induce androgen receptor ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent depletion. This strategy enables researchers to study receptor protein loss beyond ligand antagonism, including effects on transcriptional regulation, receptor scaffold function, chromatin-associated complexes, and ligand-binding domain dependence. Androgen receptor antagonist 1 is useful for AR degrader development, nuclear receptor chemical biology, linker attachment analysis, target engagement assays, and comparison of antagonist-derived warheads in hormone receptor degradation workflows.

Androgen receptor antagonist 1

Structure of 1338812-36-4

Quality
Assurance

Worldwide
Delivery

24/7 Customer
Support
Category
Ligand for Target Protein
Molecular Formula
C21H25ClN4O3
Molecular Weight
416.90

* For research and manufacturing use only. Not for human or clinical use.

SizePriceStockQuantity
-- $-- In stock

Looking for different specifications? Click to request a custom quote!

Capabilities & Facilities

  • Comprehensive PROTAC Platform
  • Scientific Expertise & Technical Support
  • Custom Synthesis & Design Service
  • Extensive Product Coverage
  • Cutting-Edge Innovation
  • Fast Delivery & Global Support
  • 24/7 customer service
  • 100% quality assurance
Popular Publications Citing BOC Sciences Products
Purity
99%
IUPACName
N-[3-(3-chloro-4-cyanophenoxy)-2,2,4,4-tetramethylcyclobutyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyrazole-4-carboxamide
Synonyms
Androgen receptor antagonist 1; 1338812-36-4; CHEMBL1916251; SCHEMBL17941138; SCHEMBL17947423; BDBM50356995; AKOS040732433; MS-27273; HY-130992; CS-0120091; N-[3-(3-chloro-4-cyanophenoxy)-2,2,4,4-tetramethylcyclobutyl]-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)pyrazole-4-carboxamide
InChI Key
HJJNHDLYWZTKGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChI
InChI=1S/C21H25ClN4O3/c1-20(2)18(25-17(28)14-11-24-26(12-14)7-8-27)21(3,4)19(20)29-15-6-5-13(10-23)16(22)9-15/h5-6,9,11-12,18-19,27H,7-8H2,1-4H3,(H,25,28)
SMILES
CC1(C(C(C1OC2=CC(=C(C=C2)C#N)Cl)(C)C)NC(=O)C3=CN(N=C3)CCO)C
Mechanism

Target: This ligand targets the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain in biochemical or cellular target-engagement studies.

Mechanism of Action: Used as the target-protein recognition element, this ligand provides the binding interface for the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain. In PROTAC design, a derivatizable position on the ligand can be connected through an optimized linker to an E3 ligase ligand, such as a CRBN, VHL, or IAP recruiter, while preserving productive target engagement. The resulting bifunctional molecule brings the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain into proximity with the recruited E3 ligase, enabling ternary-complex formation. If the complex has favorable geometry and residence time, target lysine ubiquitination is promoted, leading to proteasome-dependent degradation in experimental systems.

Applications

• PROTAC-Mediated AR Degradation: Use Androgen receptor antagonist 1 as a targeting ligand to build androgen receptor (AR) PROTACs that recruit an E3 ligase and drive ubiquitination-dependent AR removal. This supports studies of AR turnover kinetics, dependency on ubiquitin–proteasome activity, and the impact of degradation versus inhibition on downstream transcriptional programs.

• E3 Ligase Recruitment Optimization: Pair Androgen receptor antagonist 1 with different E3 ligase-recruiting modules to systematically tune ternary complex formation and degradation potency. Researchers can vary linker length, attachment points, and stereochemistry to map structure–activity relationships that govern AR engagement, residence time, and efficient ubiquitin transfer.

• Resistance Mechanism Dissection: Apply AR-targeting PROTACs derived from Androgen receptor antagonist 1 to probe mechanisms underlying resistance to conventional AR antagonists. By comparing degradation efficiency and AR signaling suppression across resistant models, experiments can distinguish whether resistance arises from altered AR stability, ligand binding, or impaired proteasomal processing.

• Transcriptional Output Remodeling Studies: Employ Androgen receptor antagonist 1-based PROTACs to evaluate how selective AR degradation reshapes androgen-responsive gene expression. Time-course analyses can correlate AR loss with changes in co-regulator recruitment, chromatin occupancy, and persistence of AR-dependent transcription, enabling mechanistic comparisons with AR inhibition-only approaches.

1. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators: Current Knowledge and Clinical Applications
Zachary J Solomon, Alexander W Pastuszak, Daniel J Mazur, Taylor P Kohn, Larry I Lipshultz, Jorge Rivera Mirabal Sex Med Rev . 2019 Jan;7(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.09.006.
Introduction:Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) differentially bind to androgen receptors depending on each SARM's chemical structure. As a result, SARMs result in anabolic cellular activity while avoiding many of the side effects of currently available anabolic steroids. SARMs have been studied in the treatment of breast cancer and cachexia and have also been used as performance-enhancing agents. Here, we evaluate and summarize the current literature on SARMs.Aim:To present the background, mechanisms, current and potential clinical applications, as well as risks and benefits of SARMs.Methods:A literature review was performed in MEDLINE using the terms selective androgen receptor modulator, hypogonadism, cachexia, breast cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, libido, and lean muscle mass. Both basic research and clinical studies were included.Main outcome measure:To complete a review of peer-reviewed literature.Results:Although there are currently no U.S. Food and Drug Agency-approved indications for SARMs, investigators are exploring the potential uses for these compounds. Basic research has focused on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents, demonstrating good availability with a paucity of drug interactions. Early clinical studies have demonstrated potential uses for SARMs in the treatment of cancer-related cachexia, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), hypogonadism, and breast cancer, with positive results.Conclusion:SARMs have numerous possible clinical applications, with promise for the safe use in the treatment of cachexia, BPH, hypogonadism, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Solomon ZJ, Mirabal JR, Mazur DJ, et al. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators: Current Knowledge and Clinical Applications. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:84-94.
2. Clascoterone: First Approval
Sohita Dhillon Drugs . 2020 Nov;80(16):1745-1750. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01417-6.
Clascoterone (Winlevi®) is an androgen receptor inhibitor being developed as a topical cream and solution by Cassiopea (a spin-out company of Cosmo Pharmaceuticals) for the treatment of androgen-dependent skin disorders, including androgenetic alopecia and acne vulgaris. Although the exact mechanism of action of clascoterone for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris is unknown, the drug is believed to compete with the androgen dihydrotestosterone for binding to androgen receptors in the sebaceous gland and hair follicles to attenuate signalling necessary for acne pathogenesis. In August 2020, clascoterone cream 1% received its first approval in the USA for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris in patients 12 years of age or older. Clinical studies of a different formulation of clascoterone (a solution containing a higher concentration of the drug) for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia are underway in Germany and the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of clascoterone leading to this first approval for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris.
3. Darolutamide and Survival in Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Iris Kuss, Boris Alekseev, Karim Fizazi, Álvaro Montesa-Pino, Teuvo L J Tammela, Evgeny Kopyltsov, ARASENS Trial Investigators, Heikki Joensuu, Matthew R Smith, E David Crawford, Felipe Cruz, María J Méndez-Vidal, Cora N Sternberg, Tapio Utriainen, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Maha Hussain, Dingwei Ye, Cheng Fu, Silke Thiele, Benjamin L Maughan, Chandler H Park, Motohide Uemura, Rui Li, Bertrand Tombal, Fred Saad, Francis Parnis N Engl J Med . 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1132-1142. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119115.
Background:Darolutamide is a potent androgen-receptor inhibitor that has been associated with increased overall survival among patients with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whether a combination of darolutamide, androgen-deprivation therapy, and docetaxel would increase survival among patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is unknown.Methods:In this international, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive darolutamide (at a dose of 600 mg [two 300-mg tablets] twice daily) or matching placebo, both in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel. The primary end point was overall survival.Results:The primary analysis involved 1306 patients (651 in the darolutamide group and 655 in the placebo group); 86.1% of the patients had disease that was metastatic at the time of the initial diagnosis. At the data cutoff date for the primary analysis (October 25, 2021), the risk of death was significantly lower, by 32.5%, in the darolutamide group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.80; P<0.001). Darolutamide was also associated with consistent benefits with respect to the secondary end points and prespecified subgroups. Adverse events were similar in the two groups, and the incidences of the most common adverse events (occurring in ≥10% of the patients) were highest during the overlapping docetaxel treatment period in both groups. The frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 66.1% in the darolutamide group and 63.5% in the placebo group; neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event (in 33.7% and 34.2%, respectively).Conclusions:In this trial involving patients with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, overall survival was significantly longer with the combination of darolutamide, androgen-deprivation therapy, and docetaxel than with placebo plus androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel, and the addition of darolutamide led to improvement in key secondary end points. The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two groups. (Funded by Bayer and Orion Pharma; ARASENS ClinicalTrials.gov number,NCT02799602.).

Androgen receptor antagonist 1 is a androgen receptor ligand intended for use as the target-engaging component or reference ligand in PROTAC discovery workflows. Its known small-molecule recognition profile enables rational linker-vector evaluation and comparative degrader design. This molecule is described in detail below.

Structure: The structure of Androgen receptor antagonist 1 is characterized by amide/urea/sulfonamide hydrogen-bonding motifs; phenol or alcohol functionality; halogenated aryl/heteroaryl ring system; heteroaromatic protein-recognition scaffold. These features provide defined hydrogen-bonding, hydrophobic, and steric elements that can support affinity retention while enabling analogue-based linker-vector selection.

Reactivity: The hydroxy or phenolic motif can be considered for ether, carbonate, carbamate, or ester linker attachment after SAR verification. For PROTAC construction, the POI ligand can be paired with CRBN ligands such as thalidomide, pomalidomide, or lenalidomide analogues, VHL ligands such as VH032 derivatives, or less common IAP/MDM2/cIAP-recruiting ligands, with alkyl, PEG, piperazine, triazole, or amide linkers screened for ternary-complex formation. In practice, incorporation into PROTACs should begin from derivatives that preserve the reported binding pharmacophore, followed by systematic variation of linker length, polarity, rigidity, and exit-vector geometry to optimize target engagement, E3 recruitment, and cellular degradation readouts.

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Related Product Recommendations

BOC Sciences Support

Please contact us with any specific requirements and we will get back to you as soon as possible.


  • Verification code

We invite you to contact us at or through our contact form above for more information about our services and products.

USA
  • International:
  • US & Canada (Toll free):
  • Email:
  • Fax:
Germany
Inquiry Basket