(S,R,S)-AHPC-amido-C5-acid

Background:Comprehensive multisystem clinical assessment using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity score (BVAS) is widely used in therapeutic studies of systemic vasculitis. Extensive use suggested a need to revise the instrument. The previous version of BVAS has been revised, according to usage and reviewed by an expert committee. Objective:To modify and validate version 3 of the BVAS in patients with systemic vasculitis.

Cholangiocarcinoma is a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumours with features of cholangiocyte differentiation: cholangiocarcinomas are categorized according to anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), or distal (dCCA). Each subtype has a distinct epidemiology, biology, prognosis, and strategy for clinical management. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, particularly iCCA, has increased globally over the past few decades. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of potentially curative treatment for all three disease subtypes, whereas liver transplantation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is restricted to a subset of patients with early stage pCCA. For patients with advanced-stage or unresectable disease, locoregional and systemic chemotherapeutics are the primary treatment options. Improvements in external-beam radiation therapy have facilitated the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, advances in comprehensive whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing have defined the genetic landscape of each cholangiocarcinoma subtype. Accordingly, promising molecular targets for precision medicine have been identified, and are being evaluated in clinical trials, including those exploring immunotherapy. Biomarker-driven trials, in which patients are stratified according to anatomical cholangiocarcinoma subtype and genetic aberrations, will be essential in the development of targeted therapies. Targeting the rich tumour stroma of cholangiocarcinoma in conjunction with targeted therapies might also be useful. Herein, we review the evolving developments in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Purpose:To verify the dose-response relation between the degree of myopia and open-angle glaucoma (OAG) risk DESIGN: Dose-response meta-analysis. Methods:We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for population-based studies published until November 30, 2020, and reporting on both myopia and OAG. Random-effect models generated pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs. Results robustness was confirmed by influence and subgroup analyses. A 2-stage dose-response meta-analysis calculated the OAG risk per unit dose of myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] decrease of 1 diopter [D]) and examined the relationship pattern. Results:The meta-analysis comprised 24 studies in 11 countries (514,265 individuals). The pooled OR of any myopia degree's association with OAG was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.66-2.13; I2 = 53%). The OR differences based on ethnicity (Asians vs Westerners) or 5 geographic areas were not statistically significant (P = .80 and P = .06, respectively). The pooled ORs of the associations between low, moderate, moderate-to-high, high myopia, and OAG were 1.50 (95% CI, 1.29-1.76), 1.69 (95% CI, 1.33-2.15), 2.27 (95% CI, 1.74-2.96), and 4.14 (95% CI, 2.57-6.69), respectively. According to the dose-response meta-analysis, the pooled OR (per SE 1-D change) was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.15-1.28). The OAG risk accelerated at approximately -6 D, and further accelerated from -8 D, showing a nonlinear concave upward slope (P = .03).Conclusions:For each unit (1-D) increase in myopia, the risk of glaucoma increases by approximately 20%. The risk more steeply increases in high-degree myopia, representing a significant nonlinear relationship.