AZ 628

 CAS No.: 878739-06-1  Cat No.: BP-300148  Purity: >98% 4.5  

AZ 628 is a pan-RAF kinase ligand that binds RAF-family kinase domains and provides a recognition scaffold for RAF-targeted degradation research. Its ability to engage BRAF, mutant BRAF, and CRAF makes it useful for exploring degraders aimed at MAPK pathway regulation. In a PROTAC molecule, the AZ 628-derived warhead would bind the RAF kinase target, while a linker connects it to an E3 ligase recruiter to promote induced proximity with ubiquitination machinery. The intended mechanism is ternary complex formation, RAF ubiquitination, and proteasome-dependent depletion. This approach can help compare RAF kinase inhibition with protein-level removal and may support studies of RAF dimerization, pathway reactivation, resistance-associated signaling, and selective degradation among RAF-family proteins.

AZ 628

Structure of 878739-06-1

Quality
Assurance

Worldwide
Delivery

24/7 Customer
Support
Category
Ligand for Target Protein
Molecular Formula
C27H25N5O2
Molecular Weight
451.52

* For research and manufacturing use only. Not for human or clinical use.

SizePriceStockQuantity
-- $-- In stock

Looking for different specifications? Click to request a custom quote!

Capabilities & Facilities

  • Comprehensive PROTAC Platform
  • Scientific Expertise & Technical Support
  • Custom Synthesis & Design Service
  • Extensive Product Coverage
  • Cutting-Edge Innovation
  • Fast Delivery & Global Support
  • 24/7 customer service
  • 100% quality assurance
Popular Publications Citing BOC Sciences Products
Purity
>98%
Synonyms
AZ628; AZ-628; AZ 628
InChI Key
ZGBGPEDJXCYQPH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
InChI
InChI=1S/C27H25N5O2/c1-17-8-9-21(31-25(33)18-6-5-7-19(12-18)27(2,3)15-28)14-24(17)30-20-10-11-23-22(13-20)26(34)32(4)16-29-23/h5-14,16,30H,1-4H3,(H,31,33)
SMILES
CC1=C(C=C(C=C1)NC(=O)C2=CC(=CC=C2)C(C)(C)C#N)NC3=CC4=C(C=C3)N=CN(C4=O)C
Mechanism

Target: This ligand targets RAF-family kinases, including BRAF and CRAF/RAF1 in biochemical or cellular target-engagement studies.

Mechanism of Action: Used as the target-protein recognition element, this ligand provides the binding interface for RAF-family kinases, including BRAF and CRAF/RAF1. In PROTAC design, a derivatizable position on the ligand can be connected through an optimized linker to an E3 ligase ligand, such as a CRBN, VHL, or IAP recruiter, while preserving productive target engagement. The resulting bifunctional molecule brings RAF-family kinases into proximity with the recruited E3 ligase, enabling ternary-complex formation. If the complex has favorable geometry and residence time, target lysine ubiquitination is promoted, leading to proteasome-dependent degradation in experimental systems.

Applications

• PROTAC-Mediated Degradation: AZ 628 can be used as a ligand component to build PROTACs that recruit an E3 ligase and drive selective ubiquitination of a chosen target protein. In targeted degradation workflows, this enables testing whether ligand engagement translates into efficient protein loss rather than only inhibition, supporting mechanism-of-action studies and pathway dissection.

• E3 Ligase Recruitment Optimization: Incorporate AZ 628 into PROTAC architectures with different E3 ligase recruiters to map how ligase selection affects ubiquitin transfer, degradation kinetics, and cellular potency. Systematic linker and recruiter variation can identify configurations that maximize ternary complex stabilization and promote sustained target depletion across relevant cellular contexts.

• Ternary Complex Mechanism Studies: Use AZ 628-based PROTAC designs to evaluate ternary complex formation between the target, the PROTAC, and the recruited E3 ligase. Biophysical and cellular assays can quantify binding cooperativity and correlate it with degradation efficiency, helping determine whether degradation is driven by stable ternary engagement or alternative ubiquitination dynamics.

• Resistance and Selectivity Profiling: Deploy AZ 628-containing PROTACs to probe target degradation robustness under perturbations such as pathway rewiring, target mutations, or altered ubiquitin-proteasome activity. Comparing degradation profiles across related proteins supports selectivity assessment and helps identify degradation mechanisms that may overcome resistance to conventional occupancy-based inhibitors.

1.A genome-scale RNA interference screen implicates NF1 loss in resistance to RAF inhibition.
Whittaker SR;Theurillat JP;Van Allen E;Wagle N;Hsiao J;Cowley GS;Schadendorf D;Root DE;Garraway LA Cancer Discov. 2013 Mar;3(3):350-62. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0470. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
RAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib and dabrafenib block BRAF-mediated cell proliferation and achieve meaningful clinical benefit in the vast majority of patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant melanoma. However, some patients do not respond to this regimen, and nearly all progress to therapeutic resistance. We used a pooled RNA interference screen targeting more than 16,500 genes to discover loss-of-function events that could drive resistance to RAF inhibition. The highest ranking gene was NF1, which encodes neurofibromin, a tumor suppressor that inhibits RAS activity. NF1 loss mediates resistance to RAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors through sustained MAPK pathway activation. However, cells lacking NF1 retained sensitivity to the irreversible RAF inhibitor AZ628 and an ERK inhibitor. NF1 mutations were observed in BRAF-mutant tumor cells that are intrinsically resistant to RAF inhibition and in melanoma tumors obtained from patients exhibiting resistance to vemurafenib, thus showing the clinical potential for NF1-driven resistance to RAF/MEK-targeted therapies.
2.Pan-RAF and MEK vertical inhibition enhances therapeutic response in non-V600 BRAF mutant cells.
Molnár E;Rittler D;Baranyi M;Grusch M;Berger W;Döme B;Tóvári J;Aigner C;Tímár J;Garay T;Hegedűs B BMC Cancer. 2018 May 8;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4455-x.
BACKGROUND: ;Currently, there are no available targeted therapy options for non-V600 BRAF mutated tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RAF and MEK concurrent inhibition on tumor growth, migration, signaling and apoptosis induction in preclinical models of non-V600 BRAF mutant tumor cell lines.;METHODS: ;Six BRAF mutated human tumor cell lines CRL5885 (G466 V), WM3629 (D594G), WM3670 (G469E), MDAMB231 (G464 V), CRL5922 (L597 V) and A375 (V600E as control) were investigated. Pan-RAF inhibitor (sorafenib or AZ628) and MEK inhibitor (selumetinib) or their combination were used in in vitro viability, video microscopy, immunoblot, cell cycle and TUNEL assays. The in vivo effects of the drugs were assessed in an orthotopic NSG mouse breast cancer model.;RESULTS: ;All cell lines showed a significant growth inhibition with synergism in the sorafenib/AZ628 and selumetinib combination. Combination treatment resulted in higher Erk1/2 inhibition and in increased induction of apoptosis when compared to single agent treatments. However, single selumetinib treatment could cause adverse therapeutic effects, like increased cell migration in certain cells, selumetinib and sorafenib combination treatment lowered migratory capacity in all the cell lines.
3.Raf/ERK drives the proliferative and invasive phenotype of BMPR2-silenced pulmonary artery endothelial cells.
Awad KS;Elinoff JM;Wang S;Gairhe S;Ferreyra GA;Cai R;Sun J;Solomon MA;Danner RL Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2016 Jan 15;310(2):L187-201. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00303.2015. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
A proliferative endothelial cell phenotype, inflammation, and pulmonary vascular remodeling are prominent features of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Bone morphogenetic protein type II receptor (BMPR2) loss-of-function is the most common cause of heritable PAH and has been closely linked to the formation of pathological plexiform lesions. Although some BMPR2 mutations leave ligand-dependent responses intact, the disruption of ligand-independent, noncanonical functions are universal among PAH-associated BMPR2 genotypes, but incompletely understood. This study examined the noncanonical signaling consequences of BMPR2 silencing in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells to identify potential therapeutic targets. BMPR2 siRNA silencing resulted in a proliferative, promigratory pulmonary artery endothelial cell phenotype and disruption of cytoskeletal architecture. Expression profiling closely reflected these phenotypic changes. Gene set enrichment and promoter analyses, as well as the differential expression of pathway components identified Ras/Raf/ERK signaling as an important consequence of BMPR2 silencing. Raf family members and ERK1/2 were constitutively activated after BMPR2 knockdown.
ConcentrationVolumeMass1 mg5 mg10 mg
1 mM2.2147 mL11.0737 mL22.1474 mL
5 mM0.4429 mL2.2147 mL4.4295 mL
10 mM0.2215 mL1.1074 mL2.2147 mL
50 mM0.0443 mL0.2215 mL0.4429 mL

AZ 628 is a RAF-family kinase ligand scaffold that may support RAF-directed degrader development. PROTAC design should preserve the fused heteroaryl recognition region and evaluate peripheral linker vectors.

Structure: AZ 628 is a RAF-family kinase ligand scaffold containing a fused heteroaryl lactam-like core, an anilide/benzamide region, a tert-alkyl nitrile substituent, and methylated heteroaryl features. The structure is aromatic, rigid, and includes several hydrogen-bond acceptors and donors.

Reactivity: For RAF-directed PROTAC design, the fused heteroaryl kinase-binding core and anilide recognition region should be retained. Linker installation is more plausibly explored from solvent-exposed aryl or amide-associated periphery in a designed analog rather than through direct modification of the parent compound. Alkyl, PEG, amide, carbamate, or aryl-linker systems may be paired with CRBN, VHL, or IAP ligands after confirming target engagement and avoiding disruption of the nitrile-bearing recognition region.

Hello, can you tell me the pKa value of AZ 628?

The pKa value of AZ 628 is 4.2.

10/5/2021

Good moring, how about the solubility of AZ 628? Thanks.

The solubility of AZ 628 is relatively low. It has a solubility of 1 mg/mL in DMSO, 0.25 mg/mL in ethanol, and less than 0.1 mg/mL in water.

2/8/2022

Stock concentration: *
Desired final volume: *
Desired concentration: *

L

* Our calculator is based on the following equation:
Concentration (start) x Volume (start) = Concentration (final) x Volume (final)
It is commonly abbreviated as: C1V1 = C2V2

* Total Molecular Weight:
g/mol
Tip: Chemical formula is case sensitive. C22H30N4O c22h30n40
g/mol
g

Related Product Recommendations

BOC Sciences Support

Please contact us with any specific requirements and we will get back to you as soon as possible.


  • Verification code

We invite you to contact us at or through our contact form above for more information about our services and products.

USA
  • International:
  • US & Canada (Toll free):
  • Email:
  • Fax:
Germany
Inquiry Basket